[C.CC USERS] [kroc-svn-commits] [kroc] r6523 - kroc/branches/avr-mega/tvm/arduino/occam/include

[Aaron Ryan]

Matt,

Oh...yes...my inexperience trips me up.  I guess my question was probing to
find out if the small size of the Arduino processor or its inherent
properties is currently prohibiting/restraing any portions/modules/libraries
of existing Occam code, that might be related to robot control, from being
implemented.  I was prompted to ask by the smiles on this site:
http://www.surveyor.com/cgi-bin/robot_journal.cgi/2007/03/29#091.

It sounds like the ATmega328 is still the most supported platform for
beginners like me...back to the grind stone. ;)

Best,
aa


On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Matt Jadud <jadudm at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Aaron Ryan <amrphoto1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Question regarding SRV-1 and Occam.  How does the SRV-1 platform compare
> to
> > the Arduino in its ability to utilize preexisting Occam modules and
> > "libraries"?  Does it have a similar set of limitations regarding servo
> > control and I/O?
>
> We have updates that need to be made to that platform... Jon or Carl
> would have to comment.
>
> That said, I'm not sure what you mean. Our first write of the Plumbing
> libraries only included support for the ATmega328. We're now expanding
> it to support a larger processor, which means we have to re-examine
> how we defined a number of things. Essentially, we're expanding the
> number of supported boards from 1 to 2.
>
> Could you be more specific as to what you mean?
>
> Cheers,
> Matt
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.concurrency.cc/pipermail/users/attachments/20100622/eb4222d8/attachment.htm>